← Choose other tools

App backend comparison

Supabase vs Firebase

Who will manage identity and application data?

Start here

Supabase

Start with Supabase when your app needs relational data and you want authentication and storage beside it.

Read the reasoning and sources →

Supabase

Combine PostgreSQL, authentication, file storage and realtime features in one backend.

Choose it for

  • Apps with relational records
  • A small team building an authenticated web or mobile app

Decision

Start with Supabase when your app needs relational data and you want authentication and storage beside it.

Trade-off

Prefer Firebase when a document-oriented mobile workflow is the deliberate architecture choice.

Cost model

Project plans, compute and additional usage

Current official pricing ↗

First boundary to learn

Authentication identifies a user; row-level security still decides which rows they may access.

Sources checked

Details, connections and lessons →

Firebase

Use managed app services, including authentication and Firestore document data.

Choose it for

  • Document-oriented apps
  • Mobile projects using Firebase platform services

Decision

Choose Firebase when its document model and mobile integrations match how your app works. Learn Security Rules before exposing data.

Trade-off

Start with Supabase instead when relationships, SQL and relational reporting are central.

Cost model

Product-specific plans and pay-as-you-go usage

Current official pricing ↗

First boundary to learn

Firestore documents are a different data model from relational tables and joins.

Sources checked

Details, connections and lessons →

These fill one role in your product

Keep one deliberate choice for this job, then connect it to the other parts of your app.

Build your stack →

This comparison does not create services or estimate a bill. Confirm current terms with the provider.